A Conversation for those involved in the Salvation Army in Scotland - with a heart for mission!
Showing posts with label corps. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corps. Show all posts
Thursday, 26 November 2015
Celebration at Glasgow City Centre Corps
Last weekend it was celebration time at Glasgow City Centre Corps with the opening of its new community church. The oldest and youngest members of the corps cut the ribbon at a day of thanksgiving for the whole community in Anderston.
When the Salvation Army first expanded from England into Scotland the first corps was in Anderston in 1879. Now the corps enter a new chapter with the opening of their new building. The building on Houldsworth Street features a modern glass front, generous grounds for a community garden and facilities for local residents which include a cafe, a larger open plan hall and a prayer space.
Captain Matt Butler says "We are now in a great position to continue to deliver our Sunday worship and our popular God's Groovy Gang children's ministry. We are also excited to be exploring the opportunities to start new programme and activities and we have a fantastic cafe space that we are looking forward to opening in the New Year. It's been an incredible journey to get to where we are with this new building. Our thanks and blessings go to all those who worked tirelessly to bring us such an incredible space."
Majors Russell and Catherine Wyles, Divisional Leaders joined with the corps for the celebrations. Major Russell Wyles says "we recognised the needs of the community in Anderston. This new centre will give us an exciting opportunity to demonstrate our belief of changing people's lives within communities and enhance the already strong ties we have with local residents."
Tuesday, 24 February 2015
'Fit for Mission' Corps - S
A SPIRITUAL CORPS
This is the last
of my blog pieces using the letters of the word ‘corps’ to spell out what makes
a Salvation Army corps (church) fit for mission. ‘S’ is for ‘Spiritual’.
In this series
we’ve already thought that a corps must be outward looking. If so, then being
deeply spiritual might appear to be too self-indulgent and other-worldly. After
all, we might become too heavenly-minded to be of any earthly good! But of
course, being spiritual is fundamental to our relationship with God – and when we
think of mission, and of the society which we are called to reach, it’s clear
that being spiritual is actually a missionary necessity. That’s because there
is a lot of spirituality out there with which we need to engage.
Dr Michael Voas
claims that around a third of the population have something called ‘fuzzy
faith’. He says, ‘Despite the decline in both believing and belonging, residual
involvement is considerable. Many people remain interested in church weddings
and funerals, Christmas services and local festivals. They believe in
“something out there”, pay at least lip service to Christian values, and may
identify with a denomination. They are neither regular church-goers nor self-consciously non-religious:
what they show is fuzzy faith.’
Then there’s
prayer. According to a Tear Fund survey, 42% of adults in the UK say they pray
and one third say ‘there is a God who watches over me and answers my prayer’. And
in a recent study of 9,000 people born in 1970, only 28% said they were not
religious. This is, as the former Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams said,
‘a society haunted by religion and not clear on what to do about it’.
The question for
us is, ‘are we clear on what to do
about it’? One answer seems to be that we need more spirituality. If someone
came to your corps seeking to explore faith, would they find a place of
spiritual depth or of spiritual shallowness? Many people avoid the church
because they see themselves as spiritual but not religious – and what they see
in the church is religion but not spirituality! To engage with spiritual
seekers we need to be spiritual corps – places of wholehearted discipleship and
passionate spirituality. This means deepening our relationship with God and
taking faith seriously enough to allow it to inform and influence our lives.
In this series
of blog pieces we’ve discovered that, to be fit for mission in the twenty-first
century, a corps needs to be Connected,
Outward looking, Responsible, Participatory and Spiritual.
Is yours?
Lieut-Colonel Jonathan Roberts
Assistant to the Secretary for Scotland
Thursday, 19 February 2015
'Fit for Mission Corps' - P
A PARTICIPATORY CORPS
In the previous three blog pieces we thought about a fit-for-mission corps
as:
Connected
Outward-looking
Responsible
The next letter in ‘corps’ is ‘P’, which stands for
‘Participatory’. What I mean by a participatory corps is one where as many people
as possible are encouraged and enabled to take part.
Some years ago Colonel David Guy wrote: ‘In the early
days of Methodism evangelism was regarded as the work of every member. With the
passing of time it was no longer the responsibility of every member but of the
class leader, minister and visiting preacher. Then of the minister only, then
of the visiting revivalist, and then of nobody. God forbid that The Salvation
Army should ever be compelled to admit a similar declension’. Unfortunately, in
many places, we have to admit just that. And it’s not just in evangelism – participation
of every kind is often lacking. What we need are corps where everyone has the
maximum opportunity to get involved.
Being participatory is not just about every-member
ministry. It’s also about participation in leadership and decision-making.
Contemporary writers on leadership say that the current need is for
participatory/collaborative leadership. That is a style of leadership where the
decision-making process is shared.
Dr Tim Elmore traces the way leadership styles have evolved
over the past fifty years.[1] In the
1950s the ‘military commander’ style predominated. This was top-down leadership
that demanded loyalty. By the late 1960s the new leadership image was the Chief
Executive Officer who had to cast a vision and persuade people to follow it. In
the 1980s the entrepreneurial style of leadership developed, characterised by
innovation and creativity. By 1990s the leader was more often seen as a coach,
ensuring that team members found a role which made best use of their strengths
and skills. Elmore sees a new kind of leader as more appropriate for the
twenty-first century. He calls this the poet/gardener leader. As a poet puts
words to what others think and feel, so a poet-leader articulates the thoughts
of the leadership team as they discern the leadings of the Spirit. And in the
same way that gardeners cultivate the soil and create an environment where
plants can grow, the gardener-leader develops, equips and empowers people.
A participatory corps is one where the load is spread –
where everyone is encouraged to use their gifts and where the leaders work,
pray and talk together to discern God’s will. That’s a fit-for-mission corps!
Lieut-Colonel Jonathan Roberts
Assistant to the Secretary for Scotland
Friday, 13 February 2015
'Fit for Mission Corps' - R
A RESPONSIBLE CORPS
How can
a Salvation Army corps be fit for mission? In
these blog articles so far we’ve used the letters of the word ‘corps’ to think
about being a ‘connected’ and an ‘outward-looking’ corps. The letter ‘R’ stands
for ‘Responsible’.
A
Salvation Army corps (church) needs to take responsibility for its own vision,
ministry and resources. Within the broad framework of Salvation Army strategy,
every corps needs to take ownership of its mission. The Army’s structure might
seem to inhibit responsibility if we view it simply as a command and control
system, but that’s not how it should be. The key words are freedom and
accountability – and these ought to encourage responsibility.
Of
course there are issues where compliance to some form of regulation or guideline
is needed – but when it comes to how a corps does mission there is a lot of
scope for initiative, creativity and imagination. A corps shouldn’t wait for
headquarters or anyone else to tell it how to reach its community. The corps is
in the community and the community is the corps’ responsibility. Ideas from
elsewhere can be helpful, but in the end it’s up to a corps to take an idea and
run with it!
A corps
is accountable to the wider Army for how it conducts its work. But its greatest
accountability is to the Lord. The parable of the talents (Matthew 25:14-30) is
often taken as a lesson to individuals to make sure they don’t waste the gifts
God has given them. The lesson is bigger than that, however. It was the
servants who took a risk with the master’s money who earned his commendation.
This is a lesson for the corps about how much energy, commitment and thought it
risks in its mission.
So,
here’s another ‘r’ – ‘risk’. Being responsible
and taking risks might sound like a contradiction! But actually God asks us to
be adventurous, to be sacrificial and to take a risk in our service for him. This
could mean all sorts of things: launching a new activity and/or abandoning an
old one, spending money on new forms of outreach or an innovative community project, planting a new corps or relocating an
existing one, and so on. Because we are accountable to him we dare not play
safe with the gospel. We have a responsibility to take a risk!
Taking
responsibility might be a daunting prospect, but we can be sure that when we
step out in faith God’s resources are available to us. After all,
responsibility is really only our response to his ability.
Lieut-Colonel Jonathan Roberts
Assistant to the Secretary for Scotland
Wednesday, 11 February 2015
'Fit for Mission Corps' - O
AN OUTWARD-LOOKING CORPS
William Booth said a corps (Salvation Army church) is ‘a
band of people united together to attack and Christianise an entire town or
neighbourhood.’ That’s still a good description as long as we interpret it for
the twenty-first century! In the previous article I used the first letter of
the word ‘corps’ to say it needs to be ‘connected’. Now I’m using the second
letter and thinking of the need to be ‘outward-looking’ if a corps is to be fit
for mission.
Booth wrote: ‘When an officer receives an appointment
from head-quarters, it is not contemplated that he shall deal merely with those
who are already gathered within the walls of certain buildings, or with those
who are already enrolled in our ranks, or with those who may be induced to come
inside them; but it is intended that he shall be an Apostle of the Gospel to
all those who live around’. You can’t get more outward-looking than that! But
what does it mean for today?
- Be focussed
on the world out there.
That’s not to say that internal matters don’t matter, but that even these
need to have an outward focus. For example, do our seating arrangements suit
newcomers, is our use of terminology easily understood, is our weekly programme
accessible? Not only that, but do we prepare our members to live out their
faith at work and at home?
- Be
aware of the needs of our communities.
Do we know what the real issues are that people around us face? One of
the characteristics of a healthy church (according to the Natural Church
Development concept) is need-orientated evangelism. But before this can be
effective we need to know the needs. Community surveys are an excellent way of
finding out.
- Be
programmed to release not to restrict.
Do we expect our members to be busy in corps-based activities or can we
allow them time to build relationships with people outside the corps? Having
time to be a Christian friend or neighbour to someone is what really counts. And,
as well as having activities in our buildings, how about encouraging our
members to join other groups, such as a running club or a book club, so they
can be a Christian influence there.
- Be
open and available to the community.
We can be outward-looking by allowing our buildings to be used by community
groups. Some may say this restricts what we can do with our own buildings, but
this might be what God is calling us
to do with our buildings – to make them a community asset and offer a ministry
of hospitality.
These are just a few ways we can look out and reach out.
It’s not easy to have such a commitment to those outside our walls, but it’s
what The Salvation Army was created for.
Lieut-Colonel Jonathan Roberts
Assistant to the Secretary for Scotland
Monday, 9 February 2015
'Fit for Mission Corps' - C
A CONNECTED CORPS
The first word is ‘connected’
In The
Salvation Army our local churches are called ‘corps’. The word is from the Latin
‘corpus’, which means ‘body’. The dictionary defines a corps as ‘a body of
troops for special service’ or ‘a body of persons engaged in the same activity’.
That’s a good description of a congregation of Salvationists, but we need to be
clear about what the special service or activity is!
Once
upon a time you could walk into any Salvation Army corps and find almost
exactly the same things. It was as if there was a blueprint that everyone had
to follow. Nowadays a better image is of the fingerprint – each corps with its
own individual identity. Of course there are similarities and there are ‘non-negotiables’,
such as our doctrines and our basic mission purpose, but in many ways each
corps is distinctive.
What
makes a corps distinctive? According to Michael Nazir-Ali, the former Bishop of
Rochester, ‘Two things shape the church and its mission: its own inner dynamic
and the world in which it finds itself’. Let’s look at these two things:
1.
The inner dynamic
The
inner dynamic of a corps includes the gifts and abilities of its members. These
are not random, but purposeful. If the Spirit ‘gives them to each one, just as
he determines’ (1 Corinthians 12:11), then the gift-mix of a corps says something
about the kind of ministry and mission that corps should have. The size of a
corps is also part of its inner dynamic. A small corps is just as important as
a large corps. It needn’t try to be a large corps in miniature – it should work
according to its own dynamics in terms of leadership, worship-style and relationships.
Similarly a large corps shouldn’t try and operate like a small or medium-sized
corps. Its particular inner dynamics might mean, for example, that the corps
officer is assisted by a pastoral team. So, don’t neglect the inner dynamic –
be connected to it.
2.
The world around
The life
of a corps should also be influenced by the world around – not in the sense of
adopting all the values of society, but in the way it responds to and serves
local people. Although a corps sometimes needs to challenge the assumptions of
its community (for example, where injustice exists) and must sometimes counter
the prevailing mood (for example, by being a beacon of hope where there is the
despair of unemployment or family breakdown), it should also reflect something
of the community’s culture, aspirations and outlook. By connecting with its
community the mission of a corps is more effective.
Bill
Hybels of Willow Creek Community Church in Chicago says, ‘The local church is
the hope of the world’. That’s only true if it’s connected with its inner dynamic
and connected with its local community.
Lieut-Colonel Jonathan Roberts
Assistant to the Secretary for Scotland
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





